News

Go-ahead given for Manor Park gym despite spending concerns

The gym will replace Manor Park Fitness Centre which closed in 2021 to make way for the new Greenhill Centre development, reports Nick Clark, Local Democracy Reporter

The Greenhill Centre development and (inset) Newham cabinet member Rita Chadha
The Greenhill Centre development and (inset) Newham cabinet member Rita Chadha

A £2.1million fit-out of a new Newham Council gym is set to go ahead despite a challenge from councillors.

Councillors on a scrutiny committee recently ordered a rethink of a decision to approve the spending on a new Manor Park gym earlier this month, but Labour council leaders voted to press ahead with the fit-out and agreed that providing “high-quality leisure facilities” is a “substantial investment in our local communities”.

Newham Council’s cabinet agreed to release the money for gym equipment at the Greenhill Centre development in High Street North last month. The new gym will be a replacement for Manor Park Fitness Centre, which closed in 2021 to make way for the new Greenhill Centre housing development.

The money will come from the council’s capital funds, which pay for assets and infrastructure and can’t be used for day-to-day spending.

But at a meeting held to challenge the decision on Tuesday, 8th October, councillors said they were “not satisfied” that the £2.1m expenditure was justified.

Members of the overview and scrutiny committee said the council should have explored “other sources of funding other than the public purse”. They called on the cabinet to review its deision to release the funding.

Speaking to the cabinet today (Thursday 23rd) overview and scrutiny chair Lester Hudson said he was “disappointed” that council leaders would “reject our recommendations”.

The Labour councillor said: “Given the pressures, how can we justify £2.1m discretionary spend on a single project when the council faces a deficit in the immediate term of £90m?”

Cllr Hudson also said the committee wasn’t happy with the financial information they’d been provided.

He said: “I would expect the financial appraisal of this scheme to show how many additional punters would break even over a five year scale.”

Cllr Hudson added that financial information – kept confidential from the press and public – was “exceptionally poor”.

However, the cabinet voted to approve a report recommending that they re-approve the spending.

The report said its contract with leisure provider GLL included providing the funding to reprovide and fit-out the gym. It said that GLL had agreed to reduce the management fee it charges the council year-on-year, on this basis.

It also said that deciding not to fund the gym would have “adverse financial consequences”. This is because the contract would have to be renegotiated and because the space had been specifically designed and built as a gym – meaning it couldn’t easily be used for another purpose.

The report added that the council had considered whether a private company could run the gym. But it said this would mean the council and GLL would lose out on fee-paying gym memberships.

Labour councillor Rita Chadha, the council’s cabinet member responsible for health, said: “This is an invest to save propopsal. This allows the council to get better return on its investment and also improve the health of its residents.”

She added: “It is right that we should think about commercial options, but they are simply not viable in this context.”

Cllr Chadha also rejected the claim that the financial information given to councillors was insufficient. She said GLL had provided “clear data and intelligence” to support the plans.

The cabinet voted unanimously to confirm the funding.


No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else. 

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or annually 

More Information about donations